تحلیل جرمشناختی ازدواج اجباری در افغانستان در پرتو نظریۀ ساختارگرایی اجتماعی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش مسائل اجتماعی ایران
حمیدرضا دانش ناری
1
,
عبدالملک پارسا
2
1 - استادیار گروه حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 - دانشجوی دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
کلید واژه: ازدواج اجباری, مردسالاری, افغانستان, خشونت علیه زنان و ارزشها.,
چکیده مقاله :
ازدواج اجباری، ازدواجی است که بدون رضایت واقعی یک یا دو طرف ازدواج واقع شده است. ازدواج اجباری به عنوان یکی از مصادیق مهم خشونت علیه زنان، پیامدهای زیانبار و درازمدت برای قربانیان این جرایم و جامعه در پی دارد. با وجود جرمانگاری و حمایت کیفری از حق آزادی بر ازدواج در قانون منع خشونت علیه زنان در نظام حقوق کیفری افغانستان، آمارهای گستردۀ این جرم بیانگر شکست رویکرد کیفرگراست. از اینرو پژوهش حاضر درصدد تبیین علتشناختی اثر ساختار اجتماعی بر ازدواج اجباری است. این مطالعه از نوع کیفی بوده، با رویکرد تحلیل مضمون انجام شده است. دادهها از طریق مصاحبههای نیمهساختاریافته با شش نفر از معتمدان و بزرگان محلی شهرستان نجراب جمعآوری و با روش تحلیل مضمون تحلیل شد. تحلیل دادهها منجر به شناسایی سه مقوله اصلی شد که مفهوم «ساختار اجتماعی ازدواج اجباری» را تبیین میکند. این مقولهها شامل نهادهای فرهنگی جنسیتی، فشار هنجارهای اجتماعی و وابستگی اقتصادی دختران به خانواده بود. یافتههای پژوهش بیانگر ارتباط زمینهمند میان ساختار اجتماعی و ازدواج اجباری است. تعریف جایگاه و منزلت اجتماعی نابرابر برای زن و مرد در قالب نهادهای فرهنگی جنسیتی مانند مردسالاری، پدرسالاری، عاجزه، فشار هنجارهای اجتماعی و وابستگی اقتصادی دختران و نابرابری قدرت در خانواده باعث سلب قدرت تصمیمگیری از زنان و دختران و افزایش میزان ازدواج اجباری میشود.
Criminological Analysis of Forced Marriage in Afghanistan in the Light of Social Structuralism Theory
Hamidreza Danesh nari*
Abolmalek Parsa**
Forced marriage is a marriage that takes place without the genuine consent of one or both parties to the marriage. As one of the significant forms of violence against women. Forced marriage has harmful and long-term consequences for its victims and for society. Despite the criminalization of forced marriage and the provision of criminal protection for the right to freedom of marriage under the Law on the Elimination of Violence against Women within the Afghan criminal justice system, the widespread prevalence of this crime indicates the failure of the punitive approach. Therefore, the present study seeks to provide an etiological explanation of the effect of social structure on forced marriage. This study is qualitative using a thematic analysis approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six local elders and community leaders in Nijrab County of Afghanestan. Data analysis resulted in the identification of three main categories that explain the concept of the "social structure of forced marriage." These categories included gendered cultural institutions, pressure from social norms, and the economic dependence of girls on their families. The findings indicate a context-dependent relationship between social structure and forced marriage. The definition of unequal social status and standing for women and men through gendered cultural institutions, such as patriarchy, paternalism, the construction of women as helpless, pressure from social norms, girls' economic dependence, and unequal power within the family, deprives women and girls of decision-making power and increases the prevalence of forced marriage.
Keywords: Forced marriage, Patriarchy, Afghanistan, Violence against women, Values.
Introduction
Forced marriage is one of the socially harmful issues rooted in both individual factors and social structural factors. As an explicit violation of the fundamental rights of women and girls, forced marriage has far-reaching consequences at the individual, family, and societal levels. This type of marriage is not limited to particular community and occurs in various countries, both traditional and modern. For example, research conducted in Spain has demonstrated the existence of forced marriage in that country (Torres & Carolina Villacampa, 2021: 2). However, the prevalence of forced marriage is higher in multicultural and traditional societies than in modern societies (Moghaddasi & Ameri, 2016: 171).
In Afghan society, particularly in rural areas, ancient traditions that conflict with Islamic principles have resulted in the consent of the parties to a marriage contract being disregarded, and families exercising control over their fate. Despite extensive efforts by domestic and international institutions to improve the status of women, a considerable number of Afghan girls, particularly in rural areas, continue to become victims of forced marriages. In response to the widespread occurrence of forced marriages, the Afghan legislature criminalized forced marriage through the enactment of the Law on the Elimination of Violence against Women in 2009. The purpose of this article is to explain the effect of social structure on forced marriage in Najran, Afghanistan.
Theoretical Foundations
The Concept of Forced Marriage
Forced marriage refers to a marriage in which the marital union is entered without the full and free consent of both parties, often because of some form of unlawful coercion (Askola, 2018: 4). In other words, forced marriage is a marriage that takes place without the consent of one or both parties to the marriage (Torres & Carolina Villacampa, 2021: 1). Coercion may range from physical force to various forms of psychological, financial, and emotional pressure, often exerted by close or extended family members (Askola, 2018: 4).
Social Structure
The idea of social structure derives from the biological metaphor of the organism, first introduced by Herbert Spencer. At that time, the term "structure" in biology referred to what is now called an organ, namely, a set of interconnected tissues that performs a specific function for the organism (Martin & Lee, 2015: 713). Drawing on biology and comparing society to a living organism, Spencer regarded society as a set of interconnected units whose functions give life to society (Delaney, 2021: 81).
The first dimension of social structure consists of collective relations Social relationships that are divided into distinctive patterns as constituent elements of society. Another dimension of social structure consists of collective manifestations, including opinions, beliefs, values, symbols, and expectations. Although these phenomena are subjective in nature, they are transmitted from one individual to another. Through transmission from one individual to another, these mental phenomena become shared and assume a regulatory and supervisory role in shaping individuals' behavior (Hosseini-Sirat, 2017: 184). Durkheim's perspective on the material and non-material dimensions of reality social structure, namely collective relations and collective manifestations inspired different approaches within structural sociology (Delaney, 2021: 149). On one side of this approach is the idea of institutional structure, which encompasses cultural or normative patterns that determine actors' expectations regarding one another's behavior and organize their relationships. On the other side is the idea of relational structure, according to which social structure encompasses social relations and interactions and functions as a pattern of reciprocal relationships and interdependencies among actors and actions, as well as the positions and statuses they occupy (Lopez & John Scott, 2006: 13).
Methodology
The present study is applied qualitative method. The aim of this research was to examine and explain the effect of social structure on forced marriage. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews. Given the sensitive nature of the research problem and its relationship to individuals' privacy, as well as victims' reluctance to participate directly in the research, the study population consisted of six local elders and community leaders from Nijrab County. Nijrab is one of the counties of Kapisa Province and is located 90 kilometers northeast of Kabul. The people of Nijrab are ethnically Tajik and Persian speaking. Because of their social status and their direct involvement in resolving conflicts in the county, including family disputes, these individuals possess a sound understanding of the culture, customs, and social structure of the local community.
The data collection instrument was a semi-structured interview designed based on the theoretical framework of the study. The interview questions focused on issues such as the concept of forced marriage, the cultural roots of forced marriage, the role of local traditions and beliefs in forced marriage, the distribution of power within the family, and women's economic dependence. Each interview lasted approximately 30 to 45 minutes and was conducted with the informed consent of the participants.
Results
Qualitative content analysis of the in-depth interviews with local community leaders resulted in the extraction of three main categories organized around the concept of the "social structure of forced marriage." These findings are not merely descriptive; they also support the theoretical foundations of social structure.
The first and most important factor underlying forced marriage in this study is a “gendered perception of women”. The interview data indicate that forced marriage is rooted in a gendered perception of women. The findings show that the community leaders' understanding of gender is based on a hierarchy of power. Within this paradigm, a woman is viewed as an individual whose identity is always defined in relation to a "man" (father, brother, or husband). This category can be analyzed through two specific subcategories.
From the perspective of local community leaders, “men possess superior rationality and experience” because of their involvement in affairs outside the home and their participation in social matters. This attribution of greater competence, in customary and moral terms, legitimizes men's authority to make decisions on behalf of weaker family members (women). In this context, male authority is represented as a form of responsibility.
The construction of “women as weak” is another manifestation of the gendered perception of women and, in contrast to male authority, portrays women as weak. Analysis of the codes extracted from the statements of local community leaders, such as "intellectually deficient" and "vulnerable to emotions," indicates the construction of women as weak within the context of Afghan society. The community leaders believe that, because of women's "intellectual weakness" and "emotional nature," they lack the competence necessary to make the most consequential decision of their lives marriage. Consequently, forced marriage is not represented as an oppressive and coercive act but rather as a "protective measure."
Disscusion and Conclusion
This article provides an explanation of the relationship between social structure and forced marriage. Based on previous studies, social structure, as an important variable, has a direct effect on individuals' actions, relationships, and social interactions. Given that marriage constitutes one of the principal arenas of gender relations between women and men, analyzing and examining the relationship between social structure and forced marriage requires the study of the fundamental values and beliefs that define the gendered status and social standing of women and men.
According to the findings of the study, men's cultural and economic hegemony within the social structure contributes to women's victimization. Through the construction of gendered institutions, society, on the one hand, assigns women a lower status and value than men and, on the other hand, gendered institutions define behavioral expectations that forced women to obey men. Based on gender-stereotypical beliefs within the context of social relations and interactions, men perceive themselves as the superior and first-class gender, while women are regarded as the weaker and second-class gender. Viewing women as a symbol of men's honor and social standing reflects a sense of ownership and a hierarchical, top-down perception of women by men.
References
Afshani, Seyed Alireza, Askari Nodoushan, Abbas, & Fazel Najafabadi, Somayeh (2009) "Reproduction of Gender Roles in Persian Textbooks at the Elementary School Level." Women in Development and Politics, 7(1), 87–107. (In Persian)
Amnesty International (2022) Submission to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 91st Session, 16 June–July 2025.
Antonoplis, Stephen (2023) Studying Personality and Social Structure. Wiley Online Library.
Askola, Heli (2018) "Responding to Vulnerability? Forced Marriage and the Law." University of New South Wales Law Journal, 41(3).
Bai, Tian (2022) "The Formation and Impact of Female Gender Stereotypes." Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 664. Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research.
Bakhshipour, Maryam, Aghajani Mersa, Hossein, & Kaldi, Alireza (2017) "Sociological Explanation of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Power Distribution in the Family and Its Effects on Women's Lifestyle: A Case Study of Married Women in Tehran." Social Problems of Iran, 8(2), 209–232. DOI: 10.22059/ijsp.2018.65060. (In Persian)
Berger, Peter, & Thomas Luckmann (2024) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Translated by Fariborz Majidi. 5th ed. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. (In Persian)
Danesh-Nari, Hamidreza, Maali, Mahdieh, & Nthari Javan, Elnaz (2024) "The Social Structure of Rape." Excellence in Law Quarterly, 15(1), 171–200.
DOI: 10.22034/thdad.2021.524874.1705. (In Persian)
Hosseini-Sirat, Seyed Mostafa (2017) "An Examination of the Concept of Social Structure in the Thought of Social Science Scholars." Farhang-e Pazhooh Quarterly, 31, 107–209. (In Persian)
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2010) Harmful Customs and Traditions and the Implementation of the Law on the Elimination of Violence against Women in Afghanistan. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, Kabul. (In Persian)
Schneider, Irene (2010) "Recent Developments in Afghan Family Law." Translated by Zoha Suadkouhifar and Seyed Ali Kazemi. Dadgostari Legal Journal, 74(72), 133–149. (In Persian)
Torres, Núria, & Carolina Villacampa (2021) "Intervention with Victims of Forced Marriage." Women & Criminal Justice, 32(3).
DOI: 10.1080/08974454.2021.1875107
Udayanga, Samitha (2022) Introduction to Sociology, Module 3: Social Structure. Department of Sociology, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka. Email: samitha@soci.ruh.ac.lk
UN-Habitat (2019) Global Land Tool Network Gender Strategy (2019–2030): Towards Securing Women’s and Girls’ Land and Property Rights. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
* Corresponding Author: Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-0422
** Ph.D. Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
abolmalekparsa@um.ac.ir
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0046-3755
اشنایدر، ایرنه (1389) «پیشرفتهای اخیر در قانون خانوادة افغانستان»، ترجمه ضحی سوادکوهیفر و سید علی کاظمی، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، سال هفتادوچهارم، شماره 72، صص 133-149.
افشانی، سید علیرضا و عباس عسکری ندوشن و سمیه فاضل نجف آبادی (1388) «بازتولید نقشهای جنسیتی در کتابهای فارسی مقطع ابتدایی»، نشریه زن در توسعه و سیاست، دوره هفتم، شماره 1، صص87-107.
بخشیپور، مریم و حسین آقاجانی مرسا و علیرضا کلدی (1396) «تبیین جامعهشناختی توزیع قدرت متقارن و نامتقارن در خانواده و تأثیرات آن بر سبک زندگی زنان (مورد مطالعه: زنان متأهل شهر تهران)»، بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، دوره هشتم، شماره 2، صص 209-232.
https://doi.org/10.22059/ijsp.2018.65060.
برگر، پتر و توماس لوکمان (1403) ساخت اجتماعی واقعیت؛ رسالهای در جامعهشناسی شناخت، ترجمه فریبرز مجیدی، چاپ پنجم، تهران، علمی و فرهنگی.
بوردیو، پییر (1404) سلطه مذکر، ترجمه محسن ناصریراد، چاپ پنجم، تهران، آگه.
حسینیسیرت، سید مصطفی (1396) «بررسی مفهوم ساختار اجتماعی در اندیشه اندیشمندان علوم اجتماعی»، فصلنامه علمی- تخصصی فرهنگ پژوهش، شماره 31، صص 107-209.
دانشناری، حمیدرضا و مهدیه معالی و الناز نثاری جوان (1403) «ساختار اجتماعی زنای به عنف»، فصلنامه تعالی حقوق، سال پانزدهم، شماره 1، صص171-200.
https://doi.org/10.22034/thdad.2021.524874.1705.
دفتر کمیساریای عالی ملل متحد برای حقوق بشر (1389) عرف و عنعنات ناپسند و تطبیق قانون منع خشونت علیه زنان در افغانستان، هیآت معاونت ملل متحد در افغانستان، کابل.
دیلینی، تیم (1400) نظریههای کلاسیک جامعهشناسی، ترجمه بهرنگ صدیقی و وحید طلوعی، چاپ چهاردهم، تهران، نشرنی.
شارون، جوئل (1389) ده پرسش از دیدگاه جامعهشناسی، ترجمه منوچهر صبوری، تهران، نشرنی.
صدر، عمر (1401) دولت مدرن و هراس از کثرتگرایی در افغانستان، کابل، امیری.
عزیز، عبدالعزیز و مرتضی حامد و نورالله صافی (1394) اضرار عرف و عنعنات ناپسند از منظر شریعت و قانون، کابل، وزارت ارشاد، حج و اوقاف.
غدیری، ماهرو (1395) «سن و رضایت به ازدواج از منظر نظام بینالمللی حقوق بشر»، فصلنامه خانوادهپژوهی، سال دوازدهم، شماره 45، صص 115-139.
کوئن، بروس (1395) مبانی جامعهشناسی، ترجمه غلامعباس توسلی و رضا فاضل، چاپ بیست وهفتم، تهران، سمت.
گروسی، سعیده (1395) جنسیت، جامعه و جامعهشناسی، تهران، جامعهشناسان.
گیدنز، آنتونیو (1400) جامعهشناسی، ترجمه منوچهر صبوری، چاپ سی¬وششم، تهران، نشرنی.
لوپز، خوزه و جان اسکات (1385) ساخت اجتماعی، ترجمه حسین قاضیان، تهران، نشرنی.
مقدسی، محمدباقر و زهرا عامری (1395) «ازدواج اجباری؛ از ممنوعیتانگاری تا جرمانگاری»، آموزههای حقوق کیفری، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، شماره 12، صص 169-198.
مقدم، مریم (1397) «بررسی عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر شکلگیری کلیشههای جنسیتی»، دوماهنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش در هنر و علوم انسانی، سال سوم، شماره 5، صص 91-105.
موحد، مجید و حلیمه عنایت و مرضیه مردانی (1391) «مطالعه عوامل زمینهای مرتبط با ساختار توزیع قدرت در خانواده (نمونه موردی زنان متأهل شهر شیراز)»، فصلنامه مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی، دوره اول، شماره 3، صص 159-178.
Amnesty International (2022) Submission to The Un Committee on Elimination Of Discrimination Against Women 91 st Session, 16 June- July 2025.
Antonoplis, Stephen (2023) studying personality and social structure, wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/spc3.
Askola, Heli (2018) Responding to Vulnerability? Forced Marriage and The Law, University of New South Wales Law Journal, Volume 41, Issue3.
Bai, Tian (2022) The Formation and Impact of Female Gender, Stereotypes, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 664, Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research.
Baral, Rameshwor (2023) Exploring the Prominent Role of Social Institutions in Society, International Research Journal of MMC (IRJMMC), Volume 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v4i2.56015.
Martin, John L and Monica Lee (2015) Social Structure, Elsevier Ltd. This article is a revision of the previous edition article by F. Chazel, volume 22, pp. 15233–15237, 2001, Elsevier Ltd.
Seelinger, Kim Thuy (2010) Forced Marriage and Aslyum: Perceiving the Invisible Harm, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 1.
Torres, Núria and Carolina Villacampa (2021) Intervention with Victims of Forced Marriage, Women and Criminal Justice, Volume 32, Issue3.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1875107.
Udayanga, Samitha (2022) Introduction to Sociology, Module 3 Social Structure, Department of Sociology, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka ka samitha@soci.ruh.ac.lk.
UN-Habitat (2019) Global Land Tool Network Gender Strategy (2019–2030) Towards Securing Women’s and Girls’ Land and Property Rights, United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
WLUML (2013) Child, Early and Forced Marriage: A MultiCountry Study, Women Living Under Muslim Laws, London, Website: www.wluml.org.
Wondmagegn, Wuletaw (2024) Social institutions: a review, Sociology International Journal, Volume 8 Issue 5.