ارزيابي جذابيت و توانمندي فناوري سیستم عامل بومی ايران از منظر كاركردهاي نظام نوآوري فناورانه
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت تکنولوژی
امیرعلی سیف الدین اصل
1
,
فاطمه ثقفي
2
,
احسان نورزاد مقدم
3
1 - دانشگاه تهران
2 - دانشگاه تهران
3 - دانشگاه علم و صنعت ايران
کلید واژه: نظام نوآوری فناورانه کارکرد جذابيت توانمندي سیستم عامل بومی,
چکیده مقاله :
سیستم عامل، به عنوان یک فناوری برتر، کلیدی ترین زیرساخت نرم افزاری در تبادل اطلاعات الکترونیکی امن برای یک کشور محسوب می شود. از این رو در اختیار داشتن فناوری یک سیستم عامل بومی در کشور می تواند افزایش ثبات اقتصادی، اشتغال و امنیت اطلاعات را به همراه داشته باشد. برخی کشورها مانند ترکیه، چین ، کانادا و امریکا تجربه تولید سیستم عامل را دارند. در این مقاله ارزيابي جذابيت و توانمندي فناوري سیستم عامل بومی ايران از منظر كاركردهاي نظام نواوري فناورانه در تجربه پیاده سازی آن مد نظر قرار گرفته است. ابتدا وضعيت سيستم عامل بومي مرور مي شود. شاخصهاي تعيين جذابيت و توانمندي سيستم عامل بومي از مرور ادبيات استخراج و با ابزار پرسشنامه و با نظر خبرگان اندازه گيري مي شود. سپس اثر کارکردهاي نظام نوآوري فناورانه سيستم عامل بومي بر جذابيت و توانمندي ايجاد شده با روش دلفي بررسي مي شود. نتایج نشان داد سيستم عامل بومي در حال حاضر جذابيت متوسطي دارد ولي از توانمندي زير حد متوسط برخوردار است. ضمنا اين نتايج نيز حاصل از اثر كاركردهاي انتشار دانش، توسعه دانش و هدايت جستجو بوده است. سیاست‌های مسئولین و کم توجهی به این حوزه باعث کند شدن توسعه این فناوری و كاهش توانمندي در اين زمينه شده است.
The high-tech operating system, is the most important software infrastructure in the exchange of secure electronic information for a country. Hence the availability of indigenous operating system technology in the country can increase economic stability, employment and information security. Some countries, such as Turkey, China, Canada and the United States, have operating system experience. In this paper, the evaluation of the attractiveness and capability of the native operating system technology of Iran will be evaluate from the perspective of the functions of the innovative technology system in its implementation experience. First, the status of the native operating system is reviewed. The criteria's for determining the attractiveness and capabilities of the native operating system are extracted from the literature review and measured by the questionnaire tool and the opinion of the experts. Then, the effect of the functions of the native operating system technology innovation system on the attractiveness and capability created by the Delphi method is investigated. The results showed that the native operating system has a moderate appetite, but has below average capability. In addition, these results are the result of the effects of knowledge dissemination functions, knowledge development and search guidance. The policy of the authorities and the lack of attention to this area has slowed the development of this technology and reduced capacity in this area.
انصاري، ر. و ديگران،" ماتريس ارزيابي جذابيت- توانمندي ابزار تدوين راهبرد فن آوري (مورد مطالعه: فن آوري فرآيند احياي آهن)"، فصلنامه بهبود مديريت ، سال نهم، شماره 29،ص 109 تا 135.
Hekkert, Marko P., et al. "Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analyzing technological change." Technological forecasting and social change 74(4), pp.413-432, 2007
. Nour, Mohamed A., AbdelRahman A. AbdelRahman, and Adam Fadlalla. "A context-based integrative framework for e-government initiatives."Government Information Quarterly 25, pp. 448-461, 2008
Saghafi, Fatemeh, Ehsan Noorzad Moghaddam, and Alireza Aslani. "Examining effective factors in initial acceptance of high-tech localized technologies: Xamin, Iranian localized operating system." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 122 : 275-288, 2017
. Hoseini M, Saghafi F, Aghayi E. A multidimensional model of knowledge sharing behavior in mobile social networks. Kybernetes. 2018 Oct 8
. Kangan, F.W. and Stiansen, T., “The growing Cyber threat from Iran, The Initial report of project pistachio harvest”, Report of American enterprise institute critical threats project and NORSE Corporation.(criticalthereats.org), April, 2015
. Dastranj, Nasrin, Sepehr Ghazinoory, Fatemeh Saghafi, and Mona Rashidirad. "The Role of OSS in Development of Software Industry in Developing Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights." International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 7(1), pp.61-78, 2016
. Lerner, Josh, and Jean Tirole. “Economic perspectives on open source.” Perspectives on free and open source software 15, pp. 47-78, 2005
. Jolly D. The issue of weightings in technology portfolio management. Technovation. 2003 May 31;23(5):383-91
. Jolly, D.R., 2012. Development of a two-dimensional scale for evaluating technologies in high-tech companies: An empirical examination. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(2), pp.307-329
. Mikkola, Juliana Hsuan. "Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management." Technovation 21, no. 7 (2001): 423-435
. Abbassi, Mohammad, Maryam Ashrafi, and Ebrahim Sharifi Tashnizi. "Selecting balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interdependencies: A Cross-Entropy based methodology." Technovation 34, no. 1 (2014): 54-63
. Lin, Chinho, and Ping-Jung Hsieh. "A fuzzy decision support system for strategic portfolio management." Decision Support Systems 38, no. 3 (2004): 383-398
. Torkaman, Amin, “Presenting the appropriate sectoral innovation pattern in Iran’s Aviation industries”, IRAMOT 2010, published in Persian, Tehran, Iran
. Bergek, Anna, Staffan Jacobsson, Bo Carlsson, Sven Lindmark, and Annika Rickne. “Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis.” Research policy 37(3), pp. 407-429, 2008
. Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., Gilsing, V., “A system failure framework for innovation policy design”. Technovation, 25, pp. 609–619, 2005
. Wieczorek, Anna J., and Marko P. Hekkert. “Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars.” Science and Public Policy, 39(1), pp. 74-87, 2012
. Malerba, f., Sectoral Systems of Innovation, Concepts, issues and analyses of six. New York: Cambridge University Pres, 2004
. Chesbrough, Henry, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West, eds. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. OUP Oxford, 2006
. Markard, Jochen, and Bernhard Truffer. "Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework." Research policy 37(4), pp. 596-615, 2008
. Musiolik, Jörg, and Jochen Markard. "Creating and shaping innovation systems: Formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany." Energy Policy 39(4), pp. 1909-1922, 2011
.