:Abstract
Tasbib
is one example of the involvement of individuals in committing a crime.
Accordingly, the perpetrator of a crime in the ordinary course of life
who has a well-to-do list and is aware of his existence, must be
answerable for his criminal conduct.
More
:Abstract
Tasbib
is one example of the involvement of individuals in committing a crime.
Accordingly, the perpetrator of a crime in the ordinary course of life
who has a well-to-do list and is aware of his existence, must be
answerable for his criminal conduct. Unless the offender, for some
reason, can withstand the burden of liability, in other words, his
affiliation is distorted, which may be due to a lack of perception or
lack of authority. Under these circumstances, you can not commit a crime
to the offender. In the course of criminal proceedings, various
defenses from the defendant are possible, which are based on the factors
responsible for solving such liability. Factors for solving the
criminal responsibility to the individual and subjective circumstances
in the perpetrator are said that despite the occurrence of the crime,
they will eliminate the criminal liability of the subject. The purpose
of this research is to investigate whether the factors for removing
criminal responsibility in recruiting from the general factors of
responsibility for responsibility are different or are expressed in
terms of allegory.
Findings of the research show that the factors for solving the
responsibility for the accrual are, in most cases, an indication of the
general criteria for the removal of criminal responsibility and are not
distinguished.
Manuscript profile