Background of the Issue of Causality in India with Reference to Nāgārjuna’s View
Subject Areas : ریشهشناسی مکاتب و آراء فلسفی در ادوار قدیم و جدید
Hossein Saberi Varzaneh
1
,
Azim Razavi Sufiani
2
1 - Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, and Denominations, and Mysticism, Farabi College, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
2 - Lecturer, Department of Political Sciences, Denominations, and Mysticism, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Keywords: India, Causality, Nāgārjuna, Śūnyatā, Buddhism,
Abstract :
The problem of causality and the cause-effect relation is of prime importance in both metaphysical and theological discussions. It also plays a significant role in the foundation of empirical sciences, ordinary life, and common sense. This problem has also been propounded in Indian religious and philosophical schools in different forms and has developed various dimensions. Following a descriptive-analytic method, this study aims to explore three problems: 1) In which context has the philosophical discussion of causality in Indian philosophical been developed? 2) How do these schools explain the cause-effect relation? 3) What is the view of Nāgārjuna, the Buddhist monk and the founder of the philosophical school of Madhyamaka, in this regard? In sum, it can be said that the philosophical discussion of causality in India has a strong presence in theological (the relationship between the world and its origin) and eschatological (the relationship between source of pain and the path leading to relief) contexts. The philosophical schools of India have propounded five different theories on explaining the issue of causality and the cause-effect relation: 1) theory of internal causality, 2) theory of external causality, 3) synthetic theory, 4) theory of negation of causality, and 5) theory of dependent origination in Buddhism. Nāgārjuna, whose view of causality mainly enjoys a negative and contradicting aspect, has expanded the Buddhist view based on the theory of Śūnyatā (lack of svabhāva or inherent, independent existence), the mutual dependence between the cause and effect, and the differentiation between the cause and condition and rejected the first four theories by resorting to several arguments. Finally, it can be said that Nāgārjuna defends causality and attempts to reconcile it with his view that beings have no inherent existence.