Evaluation and selection of suppliers under uncertainty (case study: MEGA MOTOR Company)
Subject Areas :Mohammad Reza Taghizadeh Yazdi 1 , Mohammad Mahdi Mozaffari 2 , Nima Saberi fard 3
1 - Tehran University
2 -
3 - Tehran University
Keywords: Supplier Selection Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Fuzzy VIKOR Fuzzy TOPSIS,
Abstract :
In the present-day competitive world, organizations for growth and stability must work hard and choose the right strategy to develop and maintain their own survival advantage.The external environment of organizations is rapidly changing among these changes the diversity of demand and customers' needs can be mentioned .Another important limitation which imposes constraints on organizations is scarcity and limitation of resources. One way to alleviate this problem is the use of agile suppliers and external resources. Thus, in the present study the effective criteria for supplier selection in Mega Motor Company are evaluated and prioritized by using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and moreover current suppliers of this company are ranked by applying fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy TOPSIS. The research method is functional and descriptive. Statistical population of this study includes 25 managers, consultants and experts who responded to the questionnaires of the research in two phases. The first step is identifying the most important criteria by utilizing one-sample t-test and then determining the weight of these criteria by using FAHP. The results showed that among the main criteria, quality and technology, with a weight of 0.259 has the first rank and is followed by characteristics of supplier, price and services of supplier. The weights of criteria show that three criteria including price, cooperation in crisis and timely delivery with weights: 0.252, 0.12, 0.12 respectively are top three criteria .In the final step, based on the weights of criteria 5 suppliers of Mega Motor Company are ranked by using Fuzzy VIKOR and Fuzzy TOPSIS.
امیری، مقصود؛ جهانی، سمانه.(1389). به كارگيري يك روش IDEA/AHP براي ارزيابي و انتخاب تأمين كنندگان. فصلنامه مدیریت صنعتی. دوره2. شماره 5.صص 18-5#
امیری، مقصود؛ مظلومی، نادر؛ حجازی، محسن.(1390).کاربرد کارت امتیازی متوازن و ویکور در رتبه بندی شرکتهای بیمه.پژوهشنامه بیمه، سال بیست و ششم، شماره 2، صص 144-115#
جباری، رامین؛ امیری، مقصود؛ صالحی صدقیانی، جمشید.(1391). ارزیابی عملکرد و انتخاب پورتفوی از صندوق های سرمایه گذاری سهام. تحقیق در عملیات و کاربردهای آن، شماره1، 19-1.#
عالم تبریز، اکبر؛ منیری، محمدرضا. (1390). بکارگیری مهندسی ارزش با رویکرد MADM فازی در بهبود عملکرد پروژه. مدیریت صنعتی، شماره 6، 98-81#
کاظمي، مصطفي و زاهدي، حميدرضا (1388). انتخاب تأمين کنندگان: مدل ها و معيارها. مشهد: جهان فردا، چاپ اول. #
کزازی، ابوالفضل؛ سعیدپور، مهدی؛ حجاریان، مسعود.(1390). رتبه بندی عناصر ماتریس SWOT در شرایط عدم قطعیت. پژوهشنامه بیمه، شماره 106، صص 54-31.#
مومنی.منصور. مباحث نوین تحقیق در عملیات،تهران. انتشارات دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران.1387.#
Amid, A.A., Ghodsypour, S.H., Brien, C.O. (2008). Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 104 (2), 394–407.#
Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12(6), 1668-1677.#
Bharadwaj, N. (2004). Investigating the decision criteria used in electronic components procurement. Industrial Marketing Management 33(4), p. 317—323.#
Büyüközkan,G., Cifci, G. (2011). A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information, Computers in Industry, 62 (2), 164–174.#
Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872–3885.#
Chang, DY.(1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 95(3), 649-655.#
Chang, T-H.(2014). Fuzzy VIKOR method: a case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan, Information Sciences (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.118#
Chen, C. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1–9.#
Chen, C., Lin, C., Huang, S. (2006) . A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection, International Journal of Production Economics, 102 (2), 289–301.#
Choi, TY., Hartley, JL.(1996). An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of operations management 14 (4), 333-343.#
Dargi, A., Anjomsoae, A., Rahimnezhad Galankashi, M., Memari, A., Binti, M.(2014). Supplier Selection: A Fuzzy-ANP Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 31,691-700.#
Davies, M. A. P. (1994). A multi-criteria decision model application for managing group decisions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(1), 47–58.#
Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S.(2014). Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers.Experts systems with applications,41,156-167#
Der Rhee Van, B., Verma, R. and Plaschka, G. (2009) ‘Understanding trade-offs in the supplier selection process: The role of flexibility, delivery, and value-added services/support’, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 120, No. 1, pp.30–41#
Dickson A.G.W. (1996). An analysis of vendor selection systems and management. Journal of Purchasing,2(1).#
Feng, D., Chen, L., & Jiang, M. (2005). Vendor selection in supply chain system: An approach using fuzzy decision and AHP. International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, Changqing, China.#
Hofmann, E., & Knébel, S. (2013). Alignment of manufacturing strategies to customer requirements using analytical hierarchy process. Production & Manufacturing Research: An Open Access Journal, 1, 19–43.#
Jolai, F., Yazdian S.A., Shahanaghi, K., Khojasteh, M.A.(2011). Integrating fuzzy TOPSIS and multi-period goal programming for purchasing multiple products from multiple suppliers. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17 (1), 42–53.#
Junior, F.RL., Osiro, O., Carpinetti, L.C.R.(2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection . Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194-209.#
Kabir G, Hasin MAA.(2012). Framework for benchmarking on-line retailing performance using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS method. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 3(4),561-576.#
Kabir G.(2012). Multiple criteria inventory classification under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2(4),76-92.#
Kabir.G, Sumi, R.S.(2014). Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from Bangladesh. Energy, 72(1),717-730.#
Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382–394.#
Kaya, Tolga. Kahraman, cengiz.(2011). Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach .Expert systems and applications.38(6),7326-7333.#
Kilincci, O., Onal, S.A.(2011).Fuzzy-AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company, Expert Sysemt and application, 38(8) 9656–9664.#
Kiser, G.E., Rao, C.P., Rao, S.R.G. (1975): Vendor Attribute Evaluations of "Buying Center" Members other than Purchasing Executives. Industrial Marketing Management, 4(1),45-54.#
Liou, T. S., & Wang, M. J. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50, 247–255.#
Min, H. (1994). International Supplier Selection: : A Multi‐attribute Utility Approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(5), 24 – 33#
Önut, S., Kara, S.S., Isik, E. (2009). Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (2), 3887–3895.#
Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert system and application.38(10),12983-12990.#
Opricovic, S.(1998).Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems.Faculty of Civil Engineering Belgerad.#
Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G.H.(2002).Multi-criteria planning of post earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and infrastructure Engineering, 17(3),211-220.#
Rahiminejad Galankashi, M., Helmi, S.A., Hashem zahi, P.(2016). Supplier selection in automobile industry: A mixed balanced scorecard-Fuzzy AHP approach.#
Sen CG, Çinar G.(2010). Evaluation and pre-allocation of operators with multiple skills: a combined fuzzy AHP and maxemin approach. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(3):2043-2053.#
Shemshadi, a., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., Tarokh, M.J. (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (10), 12160–12167.#
Vinodh, S., Ramiya, R.A., Gautham, S.G. (2011). Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organization. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 272–280.#
Wadhwa V, Ravindran AR (2007). Vendor selection in outsourcing. Comput. Operat. Res., 34, 3725-3737#
Wang, G.; Huang, S. H., & Dismukes, J. P. (2005). Manufacturing supply chain design and evaluation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(1), 93-100.#
Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2007). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 735–747.#
Weber CA, Current JR, Benton WC.(1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1), pp: 2–18.#
Wind, Y., Green, P E., and Robinson, P.J. (1968). The determinants of vendor selection: The evaluation function approach, Journal of Purchasing,4(3), 129-141.#
Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2011). A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(4), 256–274.#
Xia,W.,Wu,Z.,2007.Supplier selection with multiple criteria involume discount environments. Omega,35(5),494–504.#