بررسی تأثیر محیط نهادی بر درک مطلوبیت و درک امکانپذیری کارآفرینی اجتماعی و اثر آن بر قصد کارآفرینی اجتماعی دانشجویان رشتههای مهندسی دانشگاههای اهواز
الموضوعات : مدیریت تحقیق و توسعهمهدی نداف 1 , شادی جلدانی 2 , سارا محمدی 3
1 - دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
2 - دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
3 - دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
الکلمات المفتاحية: درک امکانپذیریدرک مطلوبیتقصد کارآفرینی اجتماعیمحیط نهادی,
ملخص المقالة :
کارآفرینی اجتماعی، ایجاد راهحلهای نوآورانه به منظور رفع مشکلات اجتماعی و بسیج ایدهها، ظرفیتها، منابع و مقررات اجتماعی مورد نیاز برای تغییرات اجتماعی است. شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر قصد کارآفرینی اجتماعی میتواند منجر به توسعه کارآفرینی اجتماعی گردد. از طرفی قصد و رفتار کارآفرینانه افراد متأثر از محیط پیرامون آنهاست، با این وجود در اکثر مطالعات کارآفرینی به اهمیت نقش محیط در شکلگیری کارآفرینی اجتماعی کمتر پرداخته شده است؛ بنابراین، در پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تأثیر محیط نهادی بر درک مطلوبیت و درک امکانپذیری کارآفرینی اجتماعی و اثر آن بر قصد کارآفرینی اجتماعی پرداخته میشود. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی-همبستگی است، جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل نمونهای متشکل از 351 دانشجوی مهندسی که در سه دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهواز و دانشگاه پیامنور اهواز مشغول به تحصیل بودند، میباشد. روایی محتوایی پرسشنامه را گروهی از خبرگان و پایایی آن نیز با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ بررسی و مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان میدهد که درک مطلوبیت و درک امکانپذیری کارآفرینی اجتماعی بر قصد کارآفرینی اجتماعی تأثیر معنیدار و مثبتی دارد. همچنین، نتایج نشان داد محیط قانونی، هنجاری و شناختی تأثیر معنیدار و مثبتی بر درک امکانپذیری و درک مطلوبیت کارآفرینی اجتماعی دارند. نتایج نشان داد محیط نهادی بهطور غیرمستقیم و از طریق درک مطلوبیت و درک امکانپذیری بر قصد کارآفرینی اجتماعی تأثیر دارد.
1- Alain, F., & Linan, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663-666.
2- Arabiyat, T. S., Mdanat, M., Haffar, M., Ghoneim, A., & Arabiyat, O. (2019). The influence of institutional and conductive aspects on entrepreneurial innovation: Evidence from GEM data. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(3), 366-389.
3- Arasti, Z., Zarei, H., & Didehvar, F. (2013). Review of regulatory policies for development of social entrepreneurship with a comparative approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 6(2), 195-214. (In Persian)
4- Arnold, M. (2017). An exploratory case study of institutional entrepreneurship: The social enterprise mark in the united kingdom. Dissertation Masters, Lund University, Sweden.
5- Bernardino, S., Santos, J. F., & Ribeiro, J. C. (2015). Social entrepreneurship: Does institutional environment make a difference?. 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places. 25-28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal.
6- Bosma, N., Content, J., Sanders, M., & Stam, E. (2018). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 483-499.
7- Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 747-767.
8- Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994-1003.
9- Certo, S. T., & Miller, T. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business Horizons, 51(4), 267-271.
10- Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213.
11- Davidsson, P. (1995). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. Paper prepared for the Rent Ix Workshop, Piacenza, Italy.
12- Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1997). Values, beliefs and regional variations in new firm formation rates. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2-3), 179-199.
13- Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intension and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesle.
15- Fuentelsaz, L., Gonzalez, C., Maícas, J. P., & Montero, J. (2015). How different formal institutions affect opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 246-258.
16- Gliedt, T., & Parker, P. (2007). Green community entrepreneurship: creative destruction in the social economy. International Journal of Social Economics, 34(8), 538-553.
17- Grundsten, H. (2004). Entrepreneurial intentions and the entrepreneurial environment: A study of technology-based new venture creation. Dissertation Doctor of Science in Technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
18- Guerrero, M., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 35-50.
19- Hallam, C., Zanella, G., Dorantes Dosamantes, C. A., & Cardenas, C. (2016). Measuring entrepreneurial intent? Temporal construal theory shows it depends on your timing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(5), 671-697.
20- Henley, A., Contreras, F., Espinosa, J. C., & Barbosa, D. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions of Colombian business students: Planned behaviour, leadership skills and social capital. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(6), 1017-1032.
21- Herrington, M., & Kew, J. (2014). Global entrepreneurship monitor: South African Report. University of Cape Town, South.
22- Jarvis, L. C. (2016). Identification, intentions and entrepreneurial opportunities: An integrative process model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(2), 182-198.
23- Karimi, S. (2015). Studying the direct, indirect and moderating effects of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intentions of agricultural students. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 8(2), 371-390. (In Persian)
24- Kautonen, T., Van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655-674.
25- Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2011). Winning in emerging markets: Spotting and responding to institutional voids. World Financial Review, 18-20. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=40392.
26- Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5-21.
27- Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
28- Kumar, G., & Borbora, S. (2019). Institutional environment differences and their application for entrepreneurship development in India. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 11(2), 177-199.
29- Linan, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and Cross‐Cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
30- Luthje, C., & Franke, N. (2003). The ‘making’of an entrepreneur: testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R & D Management, 33(2), 135-147.
31- Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
32- Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419-435.
33- Mair, J., & Noboa, E. 2006. Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121-135). London: Palgrave.
34- Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 203-218.
35- Moradi, M., Imanipour, N., Arasti, Z., & Mohammadkazemi, R. (2018). Identification of different dimensions of entrepreneurial intention in poor people based on the capabilities approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 11(2), 361-380. (In Persian)
36- Munoz, P., & Kibler, E. (2016). Institutional complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1314-1318.
37- Naveebrahim, A & Yousfy, F. (2016). Organizational silence factors as an obstacle in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 7(26), 133-157. (In Persian)
38- Norouzi, H., Moshabaki, A., Khodadad Hosseini, S. H., & Kordnaeij, A. (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence capabilities and organizational entrepreneurship: A Case study of Iran's commercial automotive industry. Innovation Management Journal, 1(2), 39-64. (In Persian)
39- Rastegar, A., Hassanpour Amiri, M., & Akbarzadeh Safouie, M. (2018). The impact of human capital and social capital on entrepreneurial intention with moderator variable of cognitive style (case of study: University of Tehran). Iranian Social Development Studies, 10(2), 41-57. (In Persian)
40- Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta–analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291-332.
41- Schwarz, E. J., Wdowiak, M. A., Almer-Jarz, D. A., & Breitenecker, R. J. (2009). The effects of attitudes and perceived environment conditions on students' entrepreneurial intent: An Austrian perspective. Education and Training, 51(4), 272-291.
42- Seelos, Ch., Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). The embeddedness of social entrepreneurship: Understanding variation across geographic communities. In C. Marquis, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Communities and Organizations, 33, 333-363.
43- Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, & K.H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72-90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44- Shook, C. L., & Bratianu, C. (2010). Entrepreneurial intent in a transitional economy: an application of the theory of planned behavior to Romanian students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 231-247.
45- Sine, W. D., & David, R. J. (2010). Institutions and entrepreneurship. West Yorkshire, Limited: Emerald Group Publishing.
46- Urban, B. (2008). Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Delineating the construct with associated skills. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14(5), 346-364.
47- Urban, B. (2013). Social entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: A focus on the institutional environment and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 11(1), 3-25.
48- Urban, B., & Kujinga, L. (2017). The institutional environment and social entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(4), 638-655.
49- Valdez, M. E., & Richardson, J. (2013). Institutional determinants of macro-level entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1149-1175.
50- Volkmann, C. K., Tokarski, K. O., & Ernst, K. (2012). Background, characteristics and context of social entrepreneurship. In C. K. Volkmann & K. O. Tokarski (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship and social business (pp. 3-30): Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.
51- Wang, M., & Shultz, K. S. (2010). Employee retirement: A review and recommendations for future investigation. Journal of Management, 36(1), 172-206.
52- Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107-125.
53- Yar mohammadzadeh, P., Mahdun, R., & GHolipur, S. (2019). Identify factors affecting the promotion of entrepreneurial culture the vocational and technical schools: the mixed method. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 2(10), 35-56. (In Persian)